RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02257
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force
Commendation Medal with one oak leaf cluster (AFCM w/1OLC).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She received the AFCM w/1OLC because of her outstanding work at
Taegu AB, South Korea. The United States Assistant District
Attorney at her Federal Court case told her and the judge that
the AFCM w/1OLC would be added to her records. The transcripts
from the Medical Board Hearing include a list of her awards.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served in the Regular Air Force from 17 May
1989 through 21 Aug 1998.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these
facts in this Record of Proceedings.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID recommends denial. DPSID states that the AFCM is
awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States,
below the grade of colonel and foreign military personnel who,
while serving in any capacity with the Air Force after 24 Mar
1958, shall have distinguished themselves by outstanding
achievement or meritorious service. DPSID was unable to locate
a Special Order, signed certificate, or any official
documentation verifying award of the AFCM w/1OLC. The evidence
in the medical board hearing is not official as it was compiled
by the applicant. Furthermore, the exhibit is not present in
any case. There was no documentation located for the Federal
Court case the applicant says she initiated. To grant the
applicant relief would be contrary to the eligibility criteria
established by DoDM 1348.33, Manual of Military Decorations and
Awards and AFI 36-2803, The Air Force Awards and Decorations
Program.
The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 29 Oct 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by
this office (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 11 Feb 2014, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2013-02257:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 May 2013.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID dated 16 Sep 2013.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 2013.
Panel Chair
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
2
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
3
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05375
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05375 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The AF Form 973, Air Force Request and Authorization for Change of Administrative Orders, revoking her AFCM be removed from her military records. The original award approval authority has since revoked this decoration and AFPC/DPSID removed the medal from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS), per AF Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02257
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR defers to the board for a decision in the applicant's request for award of the MSM w/1OLC. Therefore, based on the evidence provided, it appears that he did in fact receive the MSM w/1OLC upon his retirement from the Air Force. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Aug 08.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05779
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05779 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicants request to change his grade to SSgt on his DD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05397
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05397 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; be amended to reflect the following: 1. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends disapproval for award of the AFCM w/1 BOLC. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01266
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01266 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect the following: a. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05618
Although the applicant provided a citation, his official military personnel records did not contain official documentation such as the signed certificate or Special Order for award of an AFCM. The Air Force Commendation Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States, below the grade of Colonel and foreign military personnel, who, while serving in any capacity with the Department of the Air Force after 28 March 1958, distinguish themselves by outstanding achievement or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05892
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05892 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Airmans Medal (AmnM) for his heroic actions performed on 26 Sep 03. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05439
_______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to consider his application as he has earned these medals and they should be reflected on his DD Form 214. According to his DD Form 214, he was awarded the VSM and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). DPSID determined the applicant should have been awarded the AFCM, RVNGC w/P and VSM w/3 BSS for his service from 29 Oct 68 to 11 Sep 72.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01359
The AFCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States, below the grade of Colonel and foreign military personnel, who, while serving in any capacity with the Department of the Air Force after 28 Mar 58, distinguished themselves by outstanding achievement or meritorious service. The original award approval authority determined the AFCM was the appropriate award to recognize the applicant's outstanding achievement on 22 Mar 75. A complete copy of the SAF/MRBP evaluation is...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00269
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the AFCM, 1OLC, indicating that based on the applicant’s military record and provided documentation, they were able to verify her entitlement to the AFEM for time served in Kuwait and the AFCM, Basic, based on Special Order GA-07. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF...